Hi Guys -
For anyone that wants to know more about the biofeedback treatment, I thought I’d share the evalution/results doc I got today. It’s long winded, but it’s interesting that I went from single digit connections on both sides even, to double digit connections. Below you’ll find all the excruciating detail:
The treatment plan in the upper extremities for this series of EMG Biofeedback treatments was to apply the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the finger extensors bilaterally for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to gain greater strength and function for finger extension. In addition, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the finger flexors for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to gain greater strength and function for finger flexion. Further, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the thumb extensors and thenar for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have greater strength and function for thumb extension and thumb opposition on the right side, and to establish some thumb extension and thumb opposition on the left side.
As far as the lower extremities are concerned, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the quadriceps bilaterally for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better weight bearing on the legs. Further, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the quadriceps and hamstrings bilaterally for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better functional weight bearing on both legs without hyperextension of the knees. In addition, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the hip abductors bilaterally for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better functional weight shift and balance during ambulation. Further, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the left hip flexor for the purpose of gaining voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to develop more voluntary control over hip flexor pattern step. In addition, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the hip abductors with the opposite hip flexors for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better weight shift balance while taking a flexor pattern step with the opposite leg. Further, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the left anterior tibialis, peroneal, and gastronomies muscles for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better dorsiflexion eversion during ambulation. In addition, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the left hamstrings for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better functional knee flexion. Finally, the treatment plan included applying the EMG Biofeedback procedures to the upper and lower abdominals for the purpose of gaining greater voluntary motor neuron recruitment to these muscle groups which is medically necessary in order to have better functional trunk control.
Overall, response to treatment was quite good; the finger extensors working with agonist and antagonist muscles initially measured 6 percent of normal on the right side and 7 percent of normal on the left side and were able to be increased to 9 percent of normal on the right side and 13 percent of normal on the left side; these gains resulted in a better functional finger extension. Finger flexors working with agonist and antagonist muscles initially measured 4 percent of normal on the right side and 5 percent of normal on the left side and were able to be increased to 11 percent of normal on the right side and to 8 percent of normal on the left side; these gains resulted in a better functional finger flexion. Thumb extensors working agonist and antagonist muscles on the right side and only working agonist muscle on the left side initially measured 9 percent of normal on the right side and 8 percent of normal on the left side and were able to be increased to 47 percent of normal on the right side and to 25 percent of normal on the left side; these gains resulted in a better functional thumb extension. The thenar working with agonist and antagonist muscles on the right side and only with agonist muscle on the left initially measured 8 percent on the right and 1 percent of normal on the left and were able to be increased to 10 percent of normal on the right side and to 2 percent of normal on the left side; these small gains will help to establish some thumb opposition function.
As far as the lower extremities are concerned, the quadriceps initially measured 5 percent of normal bilaterally and were able to be increased to 23 percent of normal on the right side and 16 percent of normal on the left side; these gains resulted in a better stability and weight bearing on both legs. The work on the quadriceps and hamstrings initially measured 7 percent of normal bilaterally and were able to be increased to 20 percent of normal on the right side and to 16 percent of normal on the left side; this resulted in a better ability to stand and ambulate without hyperextension of the knees. The work on the hip abductors initially measured 4 percent of normal on the right side and 3 percent of normal on the left side and were able to be increased to 47 percent of normal on the right side and to 10 percent of normal on the left side; these gains resulted in a better functional weight shift and balance during ambulation. The work on the left hip flexor which initially measured 8 percent of normal was able to be increased to 17 percent of normal; these gains resulted in a better functional hip flexor pattern step during the gait.
The work on the hip abductors with the opposite hip flexors initially measured 17 percent of normal on the right side and 7 percent of normal on the left side and were able to be increased to 22 percent of normal on the right side and to 13 percent of normal on the left side. This resulted in a better weight shift and balance on one leg with an opposite hip flexion pattern step while maintaining balance for safer ambulation. The work on the left anterior tibialis and peroneal muscles which initially measured 6 percent of voluntary motor neuron recruitment was able to be increased to 16 percent of normal; these gains resulted in a better functional dorsiflexion of the foot. The left hamstrings which initially measured 5 percent of normal were able to be increased to 7 percent of normal; this gain small resulted in establishing some knee flexion function. Finally, the work on the upper and lower abdominal initially measured 19 percent of normal on the right side and 11 percent of normal on the left side and were able to be increased to 22 percent of normal on the right side and 14 percent of normal on the left side; these gains resulted in better trunk control and balance.
In summary, it is apparent that Ms. DeG has an incomplete spinal cord injury at C4-C7 and has experienced some long term motor neuron recovery. She has responded extremely well to this series of EMG Biofeedback treatments gaining substantial increases in voluntary motor neuron recruitment to muscles below the level of her spinal cord injury. At this time an aggressive exercise and therapy program to strengthen the muscles groups that now have greater voluntary motor neuron control should result in greater strength and function.